screwdriver device (Jeil Medical)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

Jeil Medical screwdriver device
Screwdriver Device, supplied by Jeil Medical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/screwdriver+device/device+screwdriver/pmc13140058-4-45-47
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews

screwdriver device - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10

86/100 stars

Images

Software:

Article Title: Effect of Micro-Osteoperforations on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Article Snippet: Gulduren et al , Northern Cyprus , parallel arm , 12 weeks , 20 (losses to follow up: 2) MOP:10 (losses to follow up: 1) Control:10 (losses to follow up: 1) , 16-24 MOP: 16.5-23.8 (21.8) Control: 16.5-23.7 (17.7) , 7F, 11M , Six MOPs (all buccal) were performed in the maxillary molar alveolar regions, with 2 perforations at each of 3 sites, between the second premolars and first molars, between the first and second molars, and distal to the second molars, using a 1.4 mm drill; perforations were 5-6 mm deep and 1.4 mm wide to penetrate the cortical plate and reach the spongious bone, the distance between perforations was N/A, and the procedure was repeated every 3 weeks for a total of 3 sessions. , Molar distalization, Maxilla , Digital scans were taken at baseline (T0) and subsequent intervals (T1, T2, T3, T4) using a CEREC Omnicam. The scans were analysed with Geomagic Studio 2014 software. 3D models were aligned along the Y-axis, and the distance between the midpoint of the first miniscrew and the distal margin of the maxillary first molar was measured and changes in this indicating tooth movement, verified from occlusal and lateral views. Device: Digital Scanning & Software (CEREC Omnicam + Geomagic Studio). .. Feizbakhsh et al , Iran , split mouth , 28 days , 20 (losses to follow up: 0) , 18-33 , 8F, 12M , Four MOPs were performed distal to the canines, 2 buccal in the maxilla and 2 buccal in the mandible, using a screwdriver device (Jeil Medical Corporation, Seoul, Korea) and bony screws measuring 1.6 mm in diameter and 3.0 mm in length; perforations were 3 mm deep, 1.6 mm wide, spaced 3 mm apart, located 5 mm from the alveolar crest, and the procedure was not repeated at each interval. , Canine retraction, Maxilla and Mandible , Models were digitized using a 3D scanner (3Shape Trios; 3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) and were analysed with Ortho Analyzer software (v.2016-1; 3Shape), where tooth movement between phases was measured. Distances between the canine and second premolar were assessed in 3 areas: the centre of the canine and premolar brackets, the canine cusp tip and premolar buccal cusp tip, and the shortest distance between the canine and premolar at the cervicogingival line. The average distance from these 3 areas was used for data analysis. (Note: distances were not reported separately by jaw.) Device: Digital Scanning & Software (3Shape Trios with Ortho Analyzer). .. Fattori et al , Brazil , parallel arm , N/A , 24 (losses to follow up: 6) MOP: 12 (losses to follow up: 3) Control:12 (losses to follow up: 3) , MOP: (27.8 ± 6.3) Control: (20.4 ± 2.6) , 11F, 7M , Three buccal MOPs were performed vertically in the space midway between the canine and second premolar, 6 mm deep and spaced 4 mm apart; the width of the perforations was not reported, and the site was 4 mm from the alveolar crest. The procedure was repeated every 28 days at each activation session for an average of 7 sessions. , Alignment, Maxilla and Mandible , Alginate impressions were taken at each activation session until space closure. A pre-retraction model (T0) was made 28 days post-archwire placement and digitized using XCAD 3D Scanner, True Image Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and Maestro 3D OrthoStudio, AGE Solutions, Pisa, Italy. Extraction space was measured linearly in 3D (Q3DC tool SlicerCMF) between the canine’s most distal point and second premolar’s most mesial point, with left-right means used for rate of tooth movement calculations. Device: Digital Scanning & Software (XCAD 3D Scanner, Maestro 3D OrthoStudio, Q3DC tool).

Article Title: Effect of Micro-Osteoperforations on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article Snippet: .. Device: Digital Scanning & Software (CEREC Omnicam + Geomagic Studio) Feizbakhsh et al39 Iran split mouth 28 days 20 (losses to follow up: 0) 18-3328 8F, 12M Four MOPs were performed distal to the canines, 2 buccal in the maxilla and 2 buccal in the mandible, using a screwdriver device (Jeil Medical Corporation, Seoul, Korea) and bony screwsmeasuring 1.6 mm in diameter and 3.0 mm in length; perforations were 3 mm deep, 1.6 mmwide, spaced 3 mm apart, located 5mm from the alveolar crest, and the procedure was not repeated at each interval. .. Canine retraction, Maxilla and Mandible Models were digitized using a 3D scanner (3Shape Trios; 3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark) and were analysed with Ortho Analyzer software (v.2016-1; 3Shape), where tooth movement between phases was measured.

Review

screwdriver device (Jeil Medical)

Structured Review

Images

Related Articles

Software:

Similar Products

Image Search Results